Longest Valid Parentheses
Problem Statement
You are given a string containing just the characters ‘(‘ and ‘)’. Your task is to find the length of the longest valid (well-formed) parentheses substring.
Example 1:
- Input:
"(())"
- Expected Output:
4
- Justification: The entire string is a valid parentheses substring.
Example 2:
- Input:
")()())"
- Expected Output:
4
- Justification: The longest valid parentheses substring is
"()()"
.
Example 3:
- Input:
"(()"
- Expected Output:
2
- Justification: The longest valid parentheses substring is
"()"
.
Constraints:
- 0 <= s.length <= 3 * 10^4
s[i]
is ‘(‘, or ‘)’.
Solution
- Understanding the Problem:
- The problem involves finding the longest sequence of valid parentheses.
- A stack data structure can be used to keep track of the indices of the invalid parentheses.
- Approach:
- Initialize a stack and push
-1
onto it as a marker for the base. - Iterate through the string and for each character:
- If it is
'('
, push its index onto the stack. - If it is
')'
, pop an element from the stack.- If the stack is not empty, calculate the length of the valid parentheses substring by subtracting the current index with the top of the stack.
- If the stack is empty, push the current index onto the stack to serve as the new base marker.
- If it is
- Initialize a stack and push
- Why This Approach Will Work:
- The stack keeps track of the indices of invalid parentheses, allowing us to easily calculate the length of valid substrings.
- By continuously calculating the length and updating the maximum length, we ensure finding the longest valid substring.
Algorithm Walkthrough
Consider the input ")()())"
:
- Initialize stack with
-1
:stack = [-1]
- Iterate through the string:
- At index
0
:')'
- Pop from stack:
stack = []
- Stack is empty, push index
0
onto stack:stack = [0]
- Pop from stack:
- At index
1
:'('
- Push index
1
onto stack:stack = [0, 1]
- Push index
- At index
2
:')'
- Pop from stack:
stack = [0]
- Calculate length:
2 - 0 = 2
- Pop from stack:
- At index
3
:'('
- Push index
3
onto stack:stack = [0, 3]
- Push index
- At index
4
:')'
- Pop from stack:
stack = [0]
- Calculate length:
4 - 0 = 4
- Pop from stack:
- At index
5
:')'
- Pop from stack:
stack = []
- Stack is empty, push index
5
onto stack:stack = [5]
- Pop from stack:
- At index
- The longest valid parentheses substring is of length
4
.
Code
1 | class Solution: |
Complexity Analysis
- Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the input string. The algorithm traverses the string once.
- Space Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the input string. In the worst case, the stack will store all characters of the string.
Serialize and Deserialize Binary Tree
Problem Statement
Given a binary tree, your task is to create two functions.
one for serializing the tree into a string format and another for deserializing the string back into the tree.
The serialized string should retain all the tree nodes and their connections, allowing for reconstruction without any loss of data.
Examples
Example 1:
Input:
[1,2,3,null,null,4,5]
Expected Output:
[1,2,3,null,null,4,5]
Justification
: The tree has the structure:
1
2
3
4
51
/ \
2 3
/ \
4 5When serialized and then deserialized, it should retain the exact same structure.
Example 2:
Input:
[1,null,2,3]
Expected Output:
[1,null,2,3]
Justification
: The tree has the structure:
1
2
3
4
51
\
2
/
3When serialized and then deserialized, it should retain the exact same structure.
Example 3:
Input:
[5,4,7,3,null,null,null,2]
Expected Output:
[5,4,7,3,null,null,null,2]
Justification
: The tree has the structure:
1
2
3
4
5
6
75
/ \
4 7
/
3
/
2
Constraints:
- The number of nodes in the tree is in the range
[0, 104]
. -1000 <= Node.val <= 1000
Solution
To serialize a binary tree, we will traverse it in a pre-order fashion (root-left-right) and generate a string representation. When we encounter a null
value, we’ll represent it with a special character, say “X”. The serialized string will have each value separated by a comma.
For deserialization, we will split the string on commas and use a queue to help in the reconstruction. We’ll take the front of the queue and check if it’s “X”. If it is, then it’s a null node, otherwise, we create a new node with the value. The same approach applies recursively for the left and right children.
- Serialization:
- Start from the root.
- If the current node is null, append “X,” to the result string.
- If not null, append its value and a comma to the result string.
- Recursively serialize the left subtree.
- Recursively serialize the right subtree.
- Deserialization:
- Split the string by comma to get a list of nodes.
- Use a queue to facilitate tree reconstruction.
- For each value in the list:
- If it’s “X”, return null.
- Otherwise, create a new node.
- Recursively deserialize the left and right children.
Algorithm Walkthrough:
Given the input: [1,2,3,null,null,4,5]
.
- Serialization:
- Start with root: 1. Add “1,” to the result string.
- Go left: 2. Add “2,” to the result string.
- Go left: null. Add “X,” to the result string.
- Go back and go right: null. Add “X,” to the result string.
- Go back to 1 and go right: 3. Add “3,” to the result string.
- Go left: 4. Add “4,” to the result string.
- Left and right of 4 are null. Add “X,X,” to the result string.
- Go back to 3 and go right: 5. Add “5,” to the result string.
- Left and right of 5 are null. Add “X,X,” to the result string.
- Resulting serialized string: “1,2,X,X,3,4,X,X,5,X,X,”.
- Deserialization:
- Split string by comma: [“1”,”2”,”X”,”X”,”3”,”4”,”X”,”X”,”5”,”X”,”X”].
- Start with “1”. Create a node with value 1.
- Move to next value “2”. Create a left child with value 2.
- Next is “X”. So, the left of 2 is null.
- Move to the next “X”. Right of 2 is also null.
- Next is “3”. Create a right child for root with value 3.
- Next is “4”. Create a left child for 3 with value 4.
- Two X’s indicate the left and right children of 4 are null.
- “5” is the right child of 3.
- Two X’s indicate the children of 5 are null.
Code
1 | # class TreeNode: |
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
- Serialization: We visit every node once and only once, which gives a time complexity of (O(n)), where (n) is the number of nodes in the tree.
- Deserialization: Similarly, for deserialization, we reconstruct every node once and only once, so the time complexity is also (O(n)).
Space Complexity
- Serialization: In the worst case, we have to append for every node and its two children. Additionally, there might be a considerable number of nulls (
X
), hence the space complexity would be (O(n)). - Deserialization: The primary space consumption lies in the recursion stack, which would be (O(h)), where (h) is the height of the tree. In the worst case, the tree could be skewed, making its height (n), so the space complexity would be (O(n)).